home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Illusion - Is Seeing Really Believing?
/
Illusion - Is Seeing Really Believing (1998)(Marshall Media)[Mac-PC].iso
/
pc
/
illusion
/
rock_fie.cxt
/
00341_Field_341.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1996-12-31
|
2KB
|
59 lines
The Corridor Illusion
In the corridor illusion, the
three cylinders look unequal in
size.
Each illusion figure that we
have considered so far seems
tailor-made to illustrate one
particular theory. The Ponzo
illusion nicely illustrates a
misapplied constancy (or
depth-processing) theory; the
Poggendorff illusion fits a
misperception-of-angle theory
(although it also can be
explained in terms of depth
processing); and the M├╝ller-
Lyer illusion is a good example
of an assimilation (or
incorrect-comparison) theory.
No one theory seems to do
justice to all these illusions.
How, then, can we explain the
illusion of extent here,
versions of which have been
known for many years as the
perspective illusion and which
has lately appeared in many
textbooks? A version such as
this one appeared in a book by
James Gibson and is now
referred to as the corridor
illusion. The illusory
difference in the perceived
size of the cylinders is quite
striking, greater than in most
geometrical illusions of extent.
The corridor illusion reveals
a greater effect of constancy
(EmmertΓÇÖs law, to be precise)
than can usually be obtained in
representational pictures. The
illusory effect is usually
explained in terms of depth
processing. Alternatively, one
might want to explain it in
terms of contrast and
assimilation or, otherwise
expressed, in terms of stimulus
relations. The proportion of
each cylinder to the height of
the corridor wall adjacent to it
differs appreciably for the
three cylinders. This was one
explanation we considered for
the Ponzo illusion, which is
quite similar to the corridor
illusion.